Thing is, There are less women in STEM, there are less women in management position etc. Therefor, either women are less interested/worse at these things (which is the conservative view) or society itself treats women differently than men. The rational behind affirmative action and programs geared towards women isnāt that women are less skilled and therefore need more help, rather that society makes it harder for a woman achieve the same as a similarly skilled man. By treating women differently we can help level the playing field.
Also, making gender āas unimportant as eye color in most things in lifeā is a completely unrealistic goal in the near future even in the most liberal countries in the world. We can (and do) strive to reach it, but thatās not a viable solution for issues we have right now.
And you know what? Legally changing your gender SHOULD be harder than filling a form. Someone whoās transgender should have no problem showing thatās what they are. The thing is to make sure the legal process is done respectfully, without making the person feel like theyāre being interrogated.
Yeah, thereās a similar issue from the other side (at least in my country) - Men will usually apply for a job if they donāt meet all the requirements, while women wonāt tend to do so.
Going on a tangent off āThe traits that people typically associate with success in leadership, such as assertiveness and strength" (from the article), that almost sounds like something form the 50s - āLook here Johnson, I need those forms, and I need them yesterday, now get moving!ā. Traits I associate with leadership (at least in high-skill modern work place) are good communication and motivation skills, ability to plan ahead and multi-tasking/ability to prioritize. Sure, once in a while a manager has to bang their fist against the table, but the real skill isnāt in banging on the table as hard as you can, itās the ability get what you want without needing to do so in the first place. Point being that, if anything, women are better managers.