![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0943eca5-c4c2-4d65-acc2-7e220598f99e.png)
He must say: “This debate is officially over” before pulling the trigger.
He must say: “This debate is officially over” before pulling the trigger.
Logic without empathy is the hallmark of psychopathy
Also i think in Spook Country (but i’m not sure) he makes them use a t-shirt with an “ugly face” which is designed to disable facial recognition.
That’s a big ass map of the Us
Ah yes I do remember hiding in the black void under the table top, where existence can’t reach you
I now understand the feeling of cultural appropriation. I’m atheist but I grew up catholic and that depiction of jesus is culturally inappropriate
I would have said they cancel out anyway
Statistically insignificant compared to how many women are killed yearly by men.
p.s. it’s just a fact, but I’m sorry for her and if this has anything to do with the man-bear thing it’s a silly way to die.
Lol good point :D
I think it reflects the point where we are as a society. Everything is crappy and we all come here to vent.
They find diamond every day? Lucky people
Vermiglio is also red in italian, maybe verdaccio
Sounds very reasonable
Lol, no. I’m talking of a general trend of the religious establishment against innovation and understanding.
Edit: Also i never said “science and religion must always oppose”. I said religion is against science. The hate is mostly unidirectional as science has mostly just indifference towards religion.
That priest, Lemaitre, was opposed to mixing science and religion and said that there was no contraddiction between his theory and what the bible says about the origin of the universe. This is a 1984-level cognitive dissonance event imo, and shows that mixing something ever growing like science with something immutable like religious establishment is very difficult especially in one direction.
This is a brilliant example of anecdotal example, which has no statistical value. I’m sure your dad is a great person.
Religion is against science. It teaches that you must have faith unsupported by evidence, which is incompatible with progress and is just an excuse for making up rules in the name of an unseen authority.
Edit: Religion is also vile: whenever they are winning, they try to squash science and its methods. Whenever they are losing, they play the martyr.
Semispaghettified