A buddhist vegan goth with questionable humour.

  • 0 Posts
  • 39 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle

  • Yeah, it is. The conversation was about gender roles, until you brought in rape.

    Was it tough?

    I’d phrase it differently. Unrealistic expectations of the opposite sex [^1] exist by both sexes, but that there outcomes for women when the stereotypes of men hold true are often more dangerous. One is saying it isn’t sexist; the other is saying that there’s a vast difference in risk.

    Then rape isn’t part of the risk you were talking about here?

    The “Would you rather a bear or…” question could be reused in a very uncomfortable way. You could swap men with a group of yoing, black, inner city men and rural white men for women. But instead of demonstrating that men are the issue and women the victims, suddenly it’d be black men who are the victims and rural white men the problem. And, yet, the fear and the risk of confirmation of stereotypes is the same - only in this case, believing those stereotypes makes people racist.

    Fear of rape, among others. Which I wanted to show is backed by the data.







  • Gloomy@mander.xyztoGreentext@sh.itjust.worksAnon gets banned from Walmart
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    And they only can provide that useless compulsive junk so cheaply because they bulk order everything and then just change their offering price after the product is manufactured. So the manufacturer can’t just say “No deal” when they already produced massive quantities that they don’t have the logistical means to sell to other buyers.

    I’m not saying that this isn’t true, but how does that work more than once? Wouldn’t any manufacturer quit working with them after this happened once? Isn’t the agreed price for a bulk order set down in writing before the manufacturing starts?

    Have you got a source for this?