Do you really want to work for a company that allows their HR department to abuse AI as a tool?
Do you really want to work for a company that allows their HR department to abuse AI as a tool?
maintaining a property
Your mistake is in framing “owning a property” as “maintaining a property”.
I sure as hell can’t keep up with my own home, let alone another.
This is exactly the problem. Many people will rent out their building, and not be up to the task to keep it habitable.
the world
Nah, just the US
Except for that one hippie guy allowing a women to touch his garment unsolicited. /s
Ah, thank you, young lad for helping this old person cross the language road today.
I don’t understand the reasoning. The serving class has never been pretty to behold. Wealthy people are the pretty ones.
We know that they’re wealthy because they haven’t got shit all over them.
basically no noise
Cars generate most of their noise from rolling when at road speed.
hitmyspot @aussie.zone
I should have known better.
At least we’re safe here on Lemmy.
γvɒn ǝʜɈ nioį
Did you just claim that NAB isn’t familiar with how the media operates? 🥴
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Association_of_Broadcasters
Award Committee: “How can we get our small, unrecognised award into public discourse?”
De Niro does something
Award Committee: “Time to drum up the rage bait, boys. All we have to do is deny De Niro.”
Lemmy Community: “Hey, I can be angry too! upvotes”
Do you guys not see what is happening here?
dig a little deeper beyond what gets radio play and you can find some good shit.
Don’t leave us hanging! What are your suggestions?
Meeting people at work is the worst way to meet people.
"Oh hey. Our major thing in common is that we’re both working for the same business.
Lets hook up so that we can be constantly reminded of work when we see each other.
On top of that: if we break up (which is highly likely) it’ll get awkward at the place where we gain money to pay for necessities."
No thanks.
Edit: Also the reason why Korea has a low birth rate isn’t due to “not dating at work”.
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-29666-6_9
Don’t fish in the company’s pool.
Believing claims on the grounds that they haven’t been disproven is just bad epistemology
Well, it’s a good thing that wasn’t my position.
If you’re claiming my fridge has no tiny invisible pink elephants you are welcome to provide evidence.
I will make no claims on the matter and thus have to provide no evidence either way.
Edit: I think you’re confusing me for the other guy.
“There is enough evidence to be confident there aren’t structural problems” is what they’re really saying.
Bro, the graphite is not there. Everything is completely normal.
Negative claims require evidence.
Otherwise a safety engineer can go to a regulator and say “There are no structural issues with this building.” He is claiming there are no issues, he needs to back that up with evidence.
Your Jedi mind tricks won’t work on me. 😜
Meanwhile, Ernie Hudson at 78 years old.