what’s easier? Convincing everyone you know to download signal or whatsapp or matrix or whatever or
having that built into the text app[convincing everyone to buy the same phone].
FTFY
When presented this way, the choice is very different.
what’s easier? Convincing everyone you know to download signal or whatsapp or matrix or whatever or
having that built into the text app[convincing everyone to buy the same phone].
FTFY
When presented this way, the choice is very different.
Harris is a common name for Americans. Sarah is too. Her name isn’t Kalama. The error shows how exotic it is to you and your autocorrect.
I hear female supporters refer to her as Kamala. I think it might have more to do with the uniqueness of the name. I don’t know of anyone who referred to Sarah Palin as Sarah.
This sounds like Rubberduck debugging.
Moats. I was kidding at first, but I’m now thinking lazy rivers are modern moats.
That sounds like an adult with a social and/or psychological issue.
I think Reddit killed forums more than Facebook did.
US Olympics is probably being overly cautious ever since Taliyah Brooks collapsed from exhaustion when they refused to delay a US Olympic trials a couple years back due to extreme heat.
Taliyah was on pace to make it to the Olympics until that happened.
I liked Devs. It had a dope concept. That show didn’t get much buzz.
Facebook is basically a dinosaur. The demographic that were the first users ran away right around the time when their parents got accounts.
Lemmy users seem older than most social media to me. Why is Star Trek TNG so popular here if not?
No slant isn’t great either. If the sidewalk isn’t banked that run seems like torture.
I think he argues in bad faith. I saw an interview he had with someone who had a disability where they were both arguing against a specific mobility technology because it could have military applications.
Everything can have military applications.
It sort of reminds me of people who don’t care about an arbitrary technology or research (let’s call it Z) and start saying “why are you working on Z, shouldn’t you be working on a cure for cancer instead”
9 times out of 10 the complainer isn’t trying to cure cancer themselves and the researcher doesn’t necessarily have the skillset to immediately switch to curing cancer.
Is it Missi Pyle’s husband Casey Anderson?
The picture’s not too clear, but I bet there aren’t a lot of famous people that are best friends with a bear.
The only time I enjoyed a toxic fan base was for the show Under the Dome. Everyone seemed to hate watch the show and it made the whole thing more fun. The toxicity had the benefit of not being about social issues and just about how the show wasn’t high quality writing.
Off the top of my head, one thing people hated is that the main character hurt her leg and wore the bandage over her jeans.
Man, I should rewatch that show.
Skylar being in this group is low-key insane. She cheated on her narcissistic drug dealing murderous husband. The rest of these folks are murderers or magical torturers.
I think most “my kid made an interesting observation” stories sound fake, but this checks out for me.
When kids think of a “law man” they probably think of sheriffs and cops. When a kid overhears an adult mention “law school” they probably think it’s where a “lawman” went to school.
I think it’s “Best Service Ever”.
The picture on this page seems to have the same screen minus the red box.
Also, it’s incredibly low effort to cover it. There’s no subscription plan for covering a webcam.
They are programmatically token predictors. It will never be “closer” to intelligence for that very reason. The broader question should be, “can a token predictor simulate intelligence?”