deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Let me tell you an anecdote. I’m Asian and grew up in an Asian country. When I was studying abroad there’s a time when my American friends were watching a Japanese drama series. I was the one asking them throughout the watch session who’s who because I couldn’t tell the actors’ faces apart.
But considering that humans do get copyright strikes when they do something too similar that should also applies to AI, doesn’t matter if it’s not exact.
“There are differences in the way men and women feel and think,” one flyer reads. “One of the reasons for this is the structural difference in the brains of men and women. It is known that men act based on theories, while women act based on emotions.”
Ew, it’s the whole thing and not just a one sentence slip. Not surprising, but still disappointing. Being an angry asshole because of testosterone is still 100% acting on emotion and not logic.
EU really is the one doing all the good work. Meanwhile, the US government is useless as a government for its size.
I think you are missing the point. The point isn’t where the money is spent the most. The point is money has to come from somewhere. And yes, ideally it would be redirected from billionaires, mega-corps and military budget, but that’s currently not happening. The money spent on space exploration is at least somewhere in the same vein as the ones spent on the environment, other researches etc. They are for the sake of making progress. Let’s look at a hypothetical situation where space exploration is getting more traction again (more than now).
And that’s the problem.
Another incorrect assumption.
And yet no reasoning given. A rather pointless response. It suggests you don’t have reasons to support your hate.
So to make a summary, for you people I am insecure, pro slavery, against women be able to vote, anti civil rights and pro totalitarianism. Anything else?
How about you stop victimising yourself and reason something meaningful for a chance? Apparently, it’s okay for you to say the side you disagree with is getting brainwashed (remember, you used the word first), and mutilating themselves (also, your word, which is wrong btw), but it’s not okay for other sides to say the same to you? Quite a hypocrite we have here.
When did i express hate?
Literally the points you are expressing. You are supporting making choices illegal to people. Choices that are extremely meaningful to some. You are encouraging their persecution.
The only one here receiving hate It’s me and i am being hated by the people who profess to spread love.
Again, stop victimising yourself LMAO.
I am a woman and your opinion sucks. Just how many percentage of people who transitioned do you think compete in sport at professional level? That’s a completely invalid reason to make it illegal for people to transition. You can disagree with having transitioned women compete in women sport, but it’s a completely different matter from the anti human rights and freedom of choice view point to stop people who want to from transitioning. It’s ridiculous this even need to be spelled out to you.
Moreover, this sounds like it stems from your insecurity more than anything, and I don’t believe that is at all a valid reason for gate keeping people. And should I mention how you lump the whole LGBTQ in the issue you have with just transpeople? You’re just hating (or conditioned to hate) and it’s petty.
Let’s go a step further, there are non binary people out there. Are you going to hate on them just because they are born that way? It’s fucking stupid.
The money though. If they are not going to pry the money out of billionaires, it has to come from somewhere (less well off people). Those are arguably better spent to improve situations on the earth than on something that’s likely to disproportionately benefit the wealthy as their plaything, extra income, escape or whatever. Especially because it should be clear to everyone except the absolute dumbest and delusional people how critical action is right now.
Yes, I understand :) Just thought it’d be nice to increase awareness of the problem.
There are problems that goes both ways, the number of subscribers, for example.
I get having megathreads, but currently kbin doesn’t care whether a post on Lemmy is pinned, so megathreads make it harder here to follow news and discussions on the topic.
Can’t be done unfortunately. There’s a limit to how many pending moderator invites there can be. r/politicalhumor did the next best thing though.
What I hate most about it is people are doing a very poorly at checking their own information intake for accuracy and misinformation already, this comes at one of the worst time to make things go south.
A recent report saying the opposite, but with proper data to back it up unlike this poorly thought out personal anecdote.
I think the best outcome is for Fediverse to succeed at proving the model is better for users than mega corps. Then grow and last long enough until the EU takes notice, such that if any bad actors try to ruin it they’d want to protect it. We’re probably talking far into the future, but I think if handled well it can get to that point.
If that’s the case then there’s no need for it to be off-record. Unless the conversation of what you pointed out is open to scrutiny it shouldn’t happen.
You can’t get Alan Becker and his team content anywhere else other than his channel. Also, I’ve followed his works ever since the first Animation vs Animator came out.