Well on the contrary you should understand it more. A gendered pronoun carries an idea of gender, and having a genderless pronoun frees the sentence of this gender assumption. Nothing very hard to understand.
Well on the contrary you should understand it more. A gendered pronoun carries an idea of gender, and having a genderless pronoun frees the sentence of this gender assumption. Nothing very hard to understand.
Cancel culture, this far-right myth that fascists love so much. You forgot to continue and talk about freedom of speech and how you are a centrist.
Refusing the change is pushing a political agenda too. But I guess it helps seeing which agenda you prefer ;)
It’s the one with a dev that thinks that replacing “he” by “they” is political propaganda?
Yeah, no thanks.
More like “oh I should change my GM” quotes from the majority of the content
Publicly available does not mean free to use.
I just use pamac. Almost never have to use pacman directly, except if somehow something broke with pamac, which is rare.
Ok boomer
“I am not ignorant”
That would have been the less insulting explanation.
The amount of ignorance in this comment is impressive.
The con of one of then being “is a rootkit”
Brave is notoriously dubious at best, encouraging ads and cryptocurrencies. It doesn’t have any advantages over a hardened Firefox (and I would say even a basic one), so using it doesn’t really make sense.
=> Big corps are the problem
Encryption is generally “open source” and that’s what makes is strong. Security does not come from people not knowing how things work, but by having properly designed things that work whether people know how they work or not.
Let’s forget wine and praise valve then I guess.
Why rely on controversial sources if you are aware of it?
Defending javascript syntax is not really a valid thing. Even js devs admit it.
Python is an overall robust language that allows you to do basically whatever you want, and does it pretty well. You can even use C extensions if you want to get peak performance.
The two domains that I believe Python cannot easily work with, are IoT where the interpreter would be a bit too cumbersome for a low-power system, and web programming, where it would still underperform Javascript and Webassembly (even though I am guessing that with a better webassembly support of the browsers, it would be possible to reach a rather efficient interpreter in-browser that would at least reach performances similar to javascript, if not better. And even if slower, the better syntax and lack of absurd rules would be a clear advantage on JavaScript).
“Use lua if you want a language that allows you to code in a crappy way” is a good argument
And where then? It is about changing a part of the software, that fits quite clearly an issue/pull request