ĝis la revido kaj dankon pro ĉiuj fiŝoj!
I hear it spreads easily.
Nice to meet ya, John. My name is Nunya Bidnez.
I just wanted to point out that this image is for the ladies and jants in the crowd.
At least one.
всё равно мне.
Mi ne parolas la rusan.
deleted by creator
A quick duckduckgo search provided several:
Even on more recent topics than Norman Lear’s show would have covered.
Not that the above is my opinion.
“What do you get when you cross a snowman and a vampire? Frostbite!”
https://subscriptions.dccomics.com/mad
Six issues For a year!
Regular price: $36.00
Your price: $19.99
You save: $16.01
But I don’t know if there’s new material or not.
If the autogenerated art becomes too close to copyrighted art, then you’ll have humans suing AI generators.
George Harrison’s My Sweet Lord is very similar to He’s So Fine by the Chiffons. And that was an easy case. But some cases in requires deeper analysis, such as Lana Del Ray’s Get Free.
In January 2018, singer Lana Del Rey claimed that Radiohead were suing her because of alleged similarities between their 1992 debut single Creep, and her song Get Free, from her 2017 album Lust for Life. The band’s publishers Warner/Chappell subsequently denied taking legal action, but did confirm requesting credit for “all writers” of Creep.
The Guardian spoke to a professional composer to analyse the songs, who noted that the chords used are rare in pop music, and the melodies bear an uncanny resemblance, although in conclusion “imagined the similarities are unintentional”.
https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20190605-nine-most-notorious-copyright-cases-in-music-history
If AI is sampling, then how do you defend it being unintentional? While all Radiohead sought was credit on the writing (in this case), would humans (whose livelihood is being threatened) be so generous with an AI composition? And if the music industry is threatened by AI, they will lawyer up.
Fair enough,
The authors may be dead, but they did exist. The work had an author.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Term_Extension_Act
If you’re going to use a character some human ever created, hire a lawyer. The House of Mouse has their own lawyers.
The fact that AI can produce this is impressive as to where we have come with AI. But can this actually threaten human artists?
In the United States, a federal judge ruled in 2023 that AI artwork cannot meet federal copyright standards because “Copyright law is ‘limited to the original intellectual conceptions of the author’.” With no author, there is no copyright.
~~https://www.makeuseof.com/copyright-rules-ai-art/~~ See u/Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 's article below.
“The answer will depend on the circumstances, particularly how the AI tool operates and how it was used to create the final work,” the office said.
Under current US law, that song is probably now in the public domain. If the law changes, that could mean that in the future, music charts potentially could be filled with AI songs. As it stands, this is most-likely a public domain music machine cranking out music that anyone can use royalty-free. It depends on the interpretation of the courts.
In general, felony charges not misdemeanors. For example
The night before, Long was shot to death outside her Butler Township home. No arrests have been made. Investigators with the Columbiana County Sheriff’s Office do say they have a person of interest in the case, and executed a search warrant at a home Thursday.
McAllen PD search for person of interest linked to burglary
Wilton police have a person of interest in illegal marijuana grow operation
If you’re a “person of interest”, the government is happy to spend the last taxpayer dime to find out what you are up to.
Apple cider (especially with a cinnamon donut).
Eggnog.
Especially books with topics you don’t agree with. And think about what you’re reading. You’ll either change your mind, become unsure but not committed to that side, or you decide that position has its flaws and you were right. In the end, you can discuss that position and sound more intelligent because you have the arguments to back up your position.
¿uǝʞɐʇ oʇoɥd ʇɐɥʇ sɐʍ ɐᴉʅɐɹʇsnⱯ uᴉ ǝɹǝɥM