![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/c8e60fd3-7981-43ca-8b7f-ff504e91dd5a.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/8140dda6-9512-4297-ac17-d303638c90a6.png)
It didn’t make any sense to me when it was originally announced, it still doesn’t. I don’t understand the project’s goals or how it’s supposed to reach those goals. The mission statement is incomprehensible to me.
Data Science
It didn’t make any sense to me when it was originally announced, it still doesn’t. I don’t understand the project’s goals or how it’s supposed to reach those goals. The mission statement is incomprehensible to me.
Sounds like your project is building arrays in different dimensions and multiplying them.
Maybe give polars and pandas a try.
Definitely check out SciPy
People keep telling me that scrapy is the best for scraping but I haven’t had time to try it yet.
Entirely depends on the project you want to build
That awesome!
There are always many ways to deal with workflow annoyances you run into. Most people go looking for plugins or write a plugin or remap some keybindings, but many forget to read the manual to look for builtin solutions. In the case of using d
, you can assign the deleted text to a register other than the default register for yank/delete commands.
dd
will delete a line and send it to register +
"xdd
will delete a line and send it to register x
p
will put the text from register +
after the cursor
"xp
will put the text from register x
after the cursor
Use any lowercase letter for a register. There’s always more beneath the surface of simple vim features.
Relevant sections of the User Manual:
RISC V seems inevitable
90’s? I assumed it was from the 80s or earlier
This sounds like is might be a legitimate bug in neovim.
What you describe seems to be what the user manual describes. OP did state “I have noautoindent set, nosmartindent set, filetype indent off” I have a hunch that they, comming from vim, used a .vim config file and didn’t realize it wasn’t loading because a .lua config file was already present in the folder. But this is just speculation.
I’ve been making reference to the much discussed “replication crisis” in academia. They are factious comments meant to be jovial, entertaining, and thought provoking.
Apparently most of them.
I’ve been comparing crates on crates.io against their upstream repositories in an effect to detect (and, ultimately, help prevent) supply chain attacks like the xz backdoor1, where the code published in a package doesn’t match the code in its repository.
The results of these comparisons for the most popular 9992 crates by download count are now available. These come with a bunch of caveats that I’ll get into below, but I hope it’s a useful starting point for discussing code provenance in the Rust ecosystem.
No evidence of malicious activity was detected as part of this work, and approximately 83% of the current versions of these popular crates match their upstream repositories exactly.
I appreciate all of what the author did here
Reproducing a recipe is something scientists struggle with, so it must be impressive when you succeed 😉
Maybe someone could modify peertube to be more microblog-like
Mp3 is a proprietary format on copyright. Some idiot ceo can came and change the rules, let’s add an ads mandatory for each decoder.
This is not true. Copyright is not relevant to an encoding standard. The standard has been unchanged for 26 years and all legal claims of patent rights related to implimentations of the standard have expired before May 2017.
@swooosh@lemmy.world you should probably know about this as well.
I’m very confused about what your requirements are based on reading your post and some of your responses to comments, but I’m going to suggest that you look into Quarto
Lots of breaking changes. It seems like all of the changes are breaking something according to these release notes.
I’m fascinated by Raku myself.