![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/b6a70bce-f540-4e4b-8719-6f7dd540c433.png)
Could we just make Weird Al the Democratic presidential nominee instead?
Could we just make Weird Al the Democratic presidential nominee instead?
…says the guy that thinks there’s going to be a brokered convention that picks somebody other than Biden.
Still less radiation than coal plants release in normal operation.
Don’t forget to think about how to keep the salt air from corroding the electronics. Either build a spare or two that you keep sealed in plastic, or find an airtight case with an integrated heat sink or something.
Edit: you might want to look into conformal coating and dielectric grease (for the connectors) as well, although I don’t know enough about that to competently give advice beyond the mere suggestion.
Inb4 the “[Choco] Leibniz — [Fig] Newton cookie controversy!”
That’s possible, but if that were the case I’d expect there to be a bunch of illegitimate children at his funeral.
I was gonna comment “yeah, but Leibniz fucks!” but then I decided to fact-check myself.
“Leibniz never married, and his funeral was only attended by his personal secretary.”
…well, shit. The meme checks out!
It used to be at least three felonies a day when violation of a website’s TOS was a violation of the CFAA (which can land you 25 years).
Did that stop being the case?
conspicuously on the same day as the Wikipedia Blackout protesting against SOPA / PIPA (PS: They’re still wanting to lock down the internet, which is why they want to kill Section 230).
Yeah, they’ve also tried to ram through ACTA, CISPA and the TPP since then.
That’s nothin’! You wanna see some weird bombs? Watch this!
Every definitive trait has some counter example that still counts because people “feel” it’s good enough.
There’s an aphorism in statstics / science: “all models are wrong, but some are useful.” I feel that the distinction between genuine off-road-capable SUVs and crossovers/tall cars/glorified station wagons or minivans is useful, even if it isn’t completely definitive. Generally speaking, if it’s a unibody vehicle it probably isn’t very good off-road, and therefore doesn’t really deserve to be called an “SUV.”
So does a 2wd “suv” (by your definition) then get declassified?
A 2WD SUV is less general-purpose, but I think they still have enough potential to count (think desert-racing prerunners, which are often 2WD but legitimate off-road vehicles).
Plenty of large “tall station wagons” are unibody. About the only legitimately capable offroad 4x4s I know of that are unibody are the Jeep Cherokee (the old one) and maybe something like a Suzuki Jimny (edit: nope, even that tiny thing is body-on-frame).
(Consider the difference between a (unibody) Toyota Highlander and a (body-on-frame) Toyota 4Runner, for example: only the latter is a “real” SUV, in terms of being capable off-road.)
I am sure there’s a real distinction
Body-on-frame with a pickup truck chassis vs. unibody construction.
The version I’ve heard is “coup cucks klan”
We tried, but then VW had to go and blow it.
and keep your style of speech different than your “real” one
Good luck with that!
I kinda feel like you’d need to run your comments through a style transfer LLM in order to do that successfully and consistently.
Definitely not. Which country the activist is in is one difference, but what they’re an activist about is another. Here in the US, some activists get shot by police while other activists get police marching with them, for example.
Qapla’!