I know you don’t think that, but imagine thinking sex was negative or morally questionable. It all comes down to money, of course. “Can’t have my brand associated with sex because some people hate sex and they might not give me their money! Better pretend like we can deny sex exists altogether.” And then the same advertisers advertise beer using boobs.

Ok, so what’s YouTube’s and tiktok’s thinking, then?

Can anybody explain what the thinking behind censoring the word “sex” is? I mean, who is it being censored for and what is the fear would happen if those people saw the uncensored word?

a-hole

Fuck birds

How do you decide when to censor yourself or not?

What the hell, OP? Don’t ommit what it taught the guy about B2B sales!

The real POV would be a closed bedroom door.

I really appreciate your analysis of what I can and can’t understand along with your obnoxious pendatry. Very valuable information, thank you. Now kindly fuck off.

I don’t and it’s irrelevant because the stupid attempt of hiding the word does not change with the skin colour of the person who made it.

“I’m gonna use a word I really shouldn’t use. But people might get mad at me for doing so. But on the other hand, the word is really edgy and cool… That’s it! I’ll just cover up part of the word so people don’t notice I’m using it! I’m so smart!”

My favourite is:

If you’re scared to spell out a scary, bad word, find another word to use instead of trying to hide it behind similar characters.

Why do real men using root type sudo, though?

The context is OP doesn’t know how to save a picture without making a screenshot.

I’m not trying to paint you anything, I’m just reading your replies. At least I did until now.

That sentence upset you to the point you feel the need to insult my intelligence, misrepresent what is written, forget that “you” can mean people in general and ignore any clarification. That’s regrettable as I’m sure you do actually understand what I’m trying to say here but can’t address it over a perceived slight.

You took a comment that addressed noone in particular a bit personal and now pretend it was meant to start a revolution on a very niche corner of the internet. Not quite what I consider worth my time.

I am and I’m looking forward to it. It might take a while before I can reply, though, so please don’t think I’m ghosting you.

You make it sound like you’re just a cog in a machine with no agency and I do believe that’s what it feels like (other countries are in late capitalism, too) but you’re not if enough of you band together. You’re not forced to watch your life pass before your eyes, you choose to play along with the machine’s game. Hell, you even got the guns to take what should be yours and you just use them to shoot at little paper targets.

I don’t think of you as fat and lazy or the devil. It’s just frustrating to see your potential go to waste like that.

Lol, that’s the mildest form of corruption I can imagine.

But do you really think a village has zoning laws in the first place?

At that scale, it’s also much easier to just remove the chief’s son from his hut on the “nice hill”. And the chief along with him. Scale being the key factor is the essence of my argument.

No, that’s not an example of votes not counting equally…? Am I misunderstanding your example?

You don’t need some mathematical proof to just count all the votes and see which candidate got more votes. It’s how most elections throughout the world work.

Sure. But it only really becomes a problem in very large communities. A chieftain overseeing 50-100 villagers isn’t as easily corrupted.