i feel like a hot rotisserie chicken is a different ball game
i feel like a hot rotisserie chicken is a different ball game
no you haven’t
you’ve described the buzzword ai = neural network
e.g. video game ai has existed far longer and has been in the public consciousness far longer and it’s mostly just a decision tree, or at best, an alpha-beta tree
depends on what kind of ai you’re talking about
the ai to determine if you will make it back okay
def will_i_make_it_back_okay(my_present_circumstances):
return False
it’s semantic
at the end of the day everything boils down to sequence and branchifs
it looks like something out of modern high fantasy
start taking off when you read the crossword
yeah i mean if you grok the underlying workings of scanf
then there’s no problem
i’d just argue that the problem is understanding what you need to understand is the problem with straight c, and with any language like c++ where you’re liable to shoot thineself in thy foot
How? They go where they point, or to NULL, and can be moved by arithmetic. If you move them where they shouldn’t go, bad things happen. If you deference NULL, bad things happen. That’s it.
what part of that is explicit to how scanf
works?
All of C++? That’s unreasonable, it’s even in the name that it’s very expansive.
similarly, “all of pointers” is unreasonable
“all of pointers” can have a lot of unexpected results
that’s literally why java exists as a language, and is so popular
Plus all previous operating systems, all supercomputer climate, physics and other science simulations, all the toaster and car and so on chips using bespoke operating systems because Linux won’t fit, every computer solving practical engineering or logistics problems numerically, renderers…
sure, and the quantity of code where true low-level access is actually required is still absolutely minuscule compared to that where it isn’t
Once you understand pointers
once you understand C++ the pitfalls of C++ are reasonably consistent
I’m not sure I’d class much of OS programming and all embedded and high-performance computing as small
there are like what, 3 operating systems these days?
assume those are all written entirely in c and combine them and compare that to all code ever written
a footgun isn’t inherently bad, it just implies a significant amount of risk
yes, if you need the ability to code on a low level, maybe C is necessary, but the times where that is actually necessary is smol
also rust
exposing the machinations of the underlying CPU with no regard for safety is like, the definition of a footgun
people say this but C is significantly more batshit than javascript
oh you used scanf
? one of the basic functions of our language? sorry that’s got a buffer overflow vulnerability so now your application is compromised
you say this but rdj doesn’t always play white guys
actually it says 8h meaning it’s only 8 hours old
i wouldn’t want to program in pure assembly either but asm is definitely powerful
use typescript and don’t look too hard at the infrastructure
my guy, i’m not the one invoking pedantry
i’m invoking the opposite of pedantry