They were a bandaid solution to a problem that Flatpaks and Snap fixed.
Arf! I’m Tony Bark. Artist and writer by day. Programmer by night. Gamer all the way.
They were a bandaid solution to a problem that Flatpaks and Snap fixed.
Yikes, those high CPU threads. Definitely needs some more polishing.
I’m just waiting for everything they haven’t killed to merge onto YouTube, at this point. Because that seems to be the direction things are headed.
If a hot dog wore pants…
Judges have ruled that they can’t be copyrighted because of this lack of a true author, and I agree.
And everyone else’s art has suffers for it.
This makes IE look tame.
Turns out the missing link was butt plugs.
Don’t put words in my mouth, and drop it already. This argument has gone on long enough. It is inconsequential and pointless. No one is settling or agreeing to fucking anything.
Apple’s whole marketing campaign is literally about privacy.
I’ve given up trying to discuss this topic that’s already been downvoted to oblivion, anyway. But, if you’re curious, I was trying to get the point that Android is pretty useless without the whole Infrastructure Google built, but they kept making it about ASOP. As if the average Joe even knows what that is.
If we judge Android on its own, yes, it can be incredibly safe and secure for its open source abilities. But that conventionally ignores everything else. Google pushes Android forward, Google creates the SDKs, Google creates the IDEs, Google creates all the non-phone variants of the OS. Android isn’t on GitHub, it’s on Google’s servers. “Biggest contributor” is an understatement.
Fine. But you can’t obviously say Android is somehow better at privacy when its biggest contributor to the code and ecosystem is a fucking indecisive ad company.
Who contributes the most to Android and push forward new releases?
It is on the subject of privacy. Chrome and Android are owned by the same company.
Did you not see what Google is shoving into Chrome?
The lawsuit is seeking class-action status and calls out ChatGPT’s ability to summarize and analyze the content written by the authors, stating this “is only possible” if OpenAI trained its GPT large language model on their works.
Uhh… I’m confused. While I get their data mining concerns, I’m not sure basing it on its abilities to summarize and analyze trained data to be a good argument. Unless you want to outlaw people reviewing something.
And it’ll be gone in two years.
And it’s just as useless as the real “truck.”
While they aren’t perfect, it’s certainly better than waiting on the distro or dealing with potential package conflicts that PPAs also had a habit of causing.