![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/cc701d3d-e218-4a8b-8875-1870b64057a1.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
Why would it increase your energy bill?
Why would it increase your energy bill?
That’s part of many people’s learning process. Meant of us, including me, have been there. Luckily, my last Windows computer was about 10 years ago. Good luck
I’m on Windows…that’s one variable I can’t change.
🤔
The Navier Stokes equations represent the universal laws of physics that can model any fluid in the universe.
These equations have been around since almost two centuries now but we still understand very little about them. When we have a set of equations we expect the following to happen-
Solution should exist- One should be able to solve the equations
Solution should be unique- Given particular initial conditions, one should obtain an unique solution to the problem. For example if you and your friend pour water into a container in an identical way, keeping all parameters (pouring velocity, direction, geometry and dimensions of the container, etc) identical then you both should get the same flow pattern. Water in both the containers should behave in exactly the same way. If your friend gets air bubbles at a point then you should get them at the exact same point as well.
Solution should be smooth- A finite change in the input should produce a finite change in the output. It should not be erratic and unpredictable.
Unfortunately, Navier Stokes equations do not satisfy any of the conditions mentioned above.
https://medium.com/@ases2409/navier-stokes-equations-the-million-dollar-problem-78c01ec05d75
That is definitely your Windows bias haunting you. Package managers are the way to get software on your Linux distro. Going straight to the source has it’s place, but for 95% of use cases, you should be using your package manager.
Different design paradigms. In 1969, they had one shot to get everything right, and prepared accordingly (not to mention, they had a massive budget since the space race was all part of the cold war).
SpaceX is taking a different approach, fail fast and cheap. They are taking an iterative approach that allows them to learn from previous failures, rather than anticipating what all those failures could be and then over engineering the rocket to prevent that.
They are different approaches, and each has their own pros and cons. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Sorry Americans…
Autocorrect is AI powered now… 🎉
Have you tried installing Linux? That usually fixes all my problems
deleted by creator
That’s not fair… He’s only that fast because he’s not being weighed down by two giant superfluous limbs
Maybe they’re slowly working toward making Windows work on the Linux kernel in order to offload maintenance costs to the open source community… 👽🛸
I just found out that if you are caught having sex in prison (in the USA), you are guilty of a sex crime regardless of if both adults consented or not.
This is only tangentially related to OPs post, but I just thought it was interesting.
Leave site and never return.
Disable JavaScript and reload
Just to screw with people more, “… Para Español, marque uno.”
At least there were no actual questions, so the community name still lives on…
It’s always projection…
Just a thought, if you leave the house to buy things, you can ensure you’re getting the things you actually want
I have no clue how the original Mad Max made it out of Australia, let alone spawn a minor cinematic universe…