snixyz123@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoWindows compatibility is insane!lemmy.mlimagemessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up183arrow-down115
arrow-up168arrow-down1imageWindows compatibility is insane!lemmy.mlsnixyz123@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square104fedilink
minus-squareBentiGorlich@gehirneimer.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoSadly exactly that is the reason that windows is just a bunch of spaghetti code XD
minus-squareBlueDiamond@rammy.sitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWhat is spaghetti code? (Sorry am non coder)
minus-squareThesePaycheckAvenging@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoAnd yet, Linux tools are even older and the kernel better written than either Windows or OSX.
minus-squarePaintedSnail@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoMost of which have to be recompiled to support newer libraries when the older libraries aren’t supported anymore. There’s a reason why package managers have to deal with dependency issues.
minus-squarenorapink@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoBefore flatpak Linux backwards compatibility was rough.
minus-squareStudioLE@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoDo you have a source for the second half of your statement?
Sadly exactly that is the reason that windows is just a bunch of spaghetti code XD
What is spaghetti code? (Sorry am non coder)
And yet, Linux tools are even older and the kernel better written than either Windows or OSX.
Most of which have to be recompiled to support newer libraries when the older libraries aren’t supported anymore. There’s a reason why package managers have to deal with dependency issues.
Before flatpak Linux backwards compatibility was rough.
Do you have a source for the second half of your statement?