ou might have seen that we’ve been defederated from beehaw.org. I think there’s some necessary context to understand what this means to the users on this instance.

How federation works

The way federation works is that the community on beehaw.org is an organization of posts, and you’re subscribed to it despite your account being on lemmy.world. Now someone posts on that community (created on beehaw.org), on which server is that post hosted?

It’s hosted on both! It’s hosted on any instance that has a subscriber. It’s also hosted on lemmy.ml, lemmygrad.ml, etc. Every instance that has a subscriber is going to have a copy of this post. That’s why if you host your own instance, you’ll often get a ton of text data just in your own server.

And the copies all stay in sync with each other using ActivityPub. So you’re reading the post that’s host on lemmy.world, and someone with an account on beehaw.org is reading the same post on beehaw.org, and the posts are kept in sync via ActivityPub. Whenever someone posts to that community or comments on a post, that data is shared to all the versions across the fediverse, and these versions are kept in sync. So up until 5 hours ago, they were the same post!

“True”-ness

A key concept that will matter in the next section is the idea of a “true” version. Effectively, one version of these posts is the “true” version, that every other community reflects. The “true” version is the one hosted on the instance that hosts the community. So the “true” version of a beehaw.org community post is the one actually hosted on beehaw.org. We have a copy, but ours is only a copy. If you post to our copy, it updates the “true” version on beehaw.org, and then all the other instances look to the “true” version on beehaw to update themselves.

The same goes for communities hosted on lemmy.world or lemmy.ml. Defederation affects how information is shared between instances. If you keep track of where the “true” version is hosted, it becomes a lot easier to understand what is going on.

How defederation works

Now take that example post from earlier, the one on beehaw.org. The “true” version of the post is on beehaw.org but the post is still hosted on both instances (again, it has a copy hosted on all instances). Let’s say someone with an account on beehaw.org comments on that post. That comment is going to be sent to every version of that post via ActivityPub, as the “true” version has been updated. That is, every version EXCEPT lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. So users on lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works won’t get that comment, because we’ve been defederated from beehaw.org. If we write a comment, it will only be visible from accounts on lemmy.world, because we posted to a copy, but our copy is now out of sync with the “true” version. So we can appear to interact with the post, but those interactions are ONLY visible by other lemmy.world accounts, since our comments aren’t send to other versions. As the “true” version is hosted on beehaw, and we no longer get beehaw updates due to defederation, we will not see comments from ANY other community on those posts (including from other defederated instances like sh.itjust.works).

The same goes for posting to beehaw communities. We can still do that. However, the “true” version of those communities are the ones on beehaw, so our posts will not be shared to other instances via ActivityPub. And all of this is true for Beehaw users with our communities. Beehaw users can continue to see and interact with Lemmy.world communities, but those interactions are only visible to other Beehaw users, since the “true” versions of the Lemmy.world communities (the ones sent to/synced with every other instance) is the Lemmy.world one.

Communities on other instances, for example lemmy.ml, are unaffected by this. Lemmy.world and beehaw.org users will still be able to interact with those communities, but posts/comments from lemmy.world users won’t be visible to beehaw.org users, as defederation prevents our posts/comments from being sent to the version of these posts hosted on beehaw.org. However, as the “true” version is the one on the third instance, we can still see everything from beehaw.org users. So we see a more filled in version than the beehaw users.

Why can I still see posts/comments from beehaw users?

Until they defederated us, posts/comments were being sent to lemmy.world, so we can see everything from before defederation. After defederation, we are no longer receiving or sending updates. So there are now multiple versions of those posts.

Why can I still interact with beehaw communities?

This won’t ever stop. You’ll notice that all posts after defederation are only from lemmy.world users. You won’t see posts/comments from ANY other instance (including instances that ) on beehaw.org communities.

Those communities will quickly suck for us, as we’re only talking to other lemmy.world users. Your posts/comments are not being sent to any other lemmy. I highly recommend just unsubscribing from those communities, since they’re pretty pointless for us to be in right now.

Why do I still see comments from beehaw users on lemmy.world communities?

Again, comments from before defederation were still sent to us. After defederation, it will no longer be possible for beehaw users to interact with the “true” version of lemmy.world communities. Their posts/comments are not being sent to any other lemmy. They also aren’t getting updates from any other lemmy, as the “true” version of those communities is on our instance.

Why do I see posts/comments from beehaw users on communities outside lemmy.world and beehaw.org?

That’s because the “true” version of those posts is outside beehaw. So we get updates from those posts. And lemmy.world didn’t defederate beehaw, so posts/comments from beehaw users can still come to versions hosted on lemmy.world.

The reverse is not true. Because beehaw defederate lemmy.world, any post/comment from a lemmy.world users will NOT be sent to the beehaw version of the post.

This seems like it’s worse for beehaw users than for us?

Yes. In my opinion, this is an extraordinarily dumb act by the beehaw instance owners. It’s worse for beehaw users than for us, and will likely result in many beehaw users leaving that instance. They said in their post that this is a nuke, but I don’t think they fully assessed the blast area. Based on their post, I don’t think they fully understand what defederation does.

  • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey I am just going to throw this out into the ether, I have been on the lemmy instances longer than beehaw, and I have yet to find an instance whos admin team I would trust less with their stated reasoning. I would not trust their stated reasoning and if I had to guess they are trying to get Lemmy.world to change something to come into line with them. if you ask me you have dodged a bullet. I hope lemmy.world stands strong

    • GONADS125@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re not wrong… beehaw admins literally have a list of demands.

      I’m okay with letting their community push out reasonable users as it festers in its toxic positivity and hypersensitivity turned into toxic hostility to nonconformity.

      It’s far from a safe place. If you so much as ask for clarification of a rule you will be labeled by their admins and toxic community as outing yourself as a bigot who doesn’t belong there.

      Whether or not it’s how it started, it feels like the most toxic users from shit reddit says migrated to beehaw under the guise of a safe place for the LGBTQI+ community.

  • delnac@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A lot of people are missing the point of their defederation, which is a lack of proper moderation team and tools for the sudden scale they are exposed to as one of the most popular place of discussion with the rexxit with them harboring some of the most active communities around.

    Their issue is mainly bad actors, trolls and harassers coming from those big instances and overwhelming them.

    Defederation is the big-nuke symptom of a wider fediverse problem, a lack of moderation tools and readiness for scale, that I also saw happen a lot on Mastodon. I followed the infosec instance and they basically ended up having to defederate the biggest mastodon instances for a few days at a time when stuff like spam and cryptobro DMs ran rampant. I’ve received many of those so I can tell you that it’s pretty real.

    Construing their decision as a desire to fracture the community is missing the actual reason they’ve tried to articulate. It’s a temporary stopgap for the 4 admins who just weren’t expecting the sort of volume and associated misbehaving problems they are suddenly getting.

    Overall, Lemmy is getting through a pretty intense “shit just got real” moment. Please bear with it, people are working really hard at solving this from what I can see.

    • SpookyMarie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the first time I’ve heard someone call the exodus from reddit “rexxit.” I haven’t been on lemmy too much yet so maybe it’s a common term I I’ve just missed but I love it.

      • delnac@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m by no means the one who coined it. I just read it someplace else, but I find it fitting too!

    • FearTheCron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Construing their decision as a desire to fracture the community is missing the actual reason they’ve tried to articulate. It’s a temporary stopgap for the 4 admins who just weren’t expecting the sort of volume and associated misbehaving problems they are suddenly getting.

      Thanks for this explanation, this makes a lot of sense and makes me less concerned about the whole thing.

      Serious question though, if a server defederates, do the communities hosted on other servers just become completely un-moderated? This seems like a serious liability for the overall community.

      • delnac@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Serious question though, if a server defederates, do the communities hosted on other servers just become completely un-moderated? This seems like a serious liability for the overall community.

        I’m not the most savvy person there but it simply means to me that the defederated server cannot post or interact with the matching server. Moderation still works on both ends, enacted by their respective teams. This is akin to a server-wide “mute” button directed to content from another server.

    • GONADS125@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believed their intentions were good at first, until I’ve read/seen how they treat users who dissent at all, and even chastise and accuse users who ask for clarification of rules as outing themselves as a bigot. That includes admin responses to users there genuinely asking about rules with terribly vague wording…

      That place is on a fast tract to becoming a shit reddit says clone; not a clone of reddit in general…

      • delnac@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve seen SRS, neogaf and resetera follow that sort of route so I get where you’re coming from.

        I’ve yet to interact a lot with beehaw so I reserve judgment on that front though. As you said, I think their defederation comes from a good place, having seen the same happen to a lot of mastodon instances.

        I do know I certainly won’t be interested if beehaw turns into the same kind of abuse-ridden, toxic hellhole as the above, that’s for sure.

    • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are plenty of instances that let you sign up instantly. To achieve that goal, they’d need de-federate with all such instances. Which they can, but I still think that’s a bad idea.

      • Noreia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because they have community rules? It’s pretty normal for communities and online spaces to have rules and moderate those rules and if you misbehave aka ignore said rules, you get either your comment deleted or banned. Just like in real life, if you are at my house and you don’t follow my rules and just dig holes in my garden or destroy something because it’s fun, I will show you the door. Same goes for online places. The server/instance owner/host etc makes the rules

  • Hypersapien@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone needs to make a regularly updated map of which instances are federated with which other instances.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems like Beehaw want to create a closed community they can moderate. That kind of makes sense for their aims but they will need to defederate from more and more services to maintain that over time.

    It seems a bit of a kneejerk in reaction to the influx of new users but essentially it means they’ll not be part of the fediverse, and they risk creating an echochamber. It’s rather the opposite of their stated aim of creating a diverse community, and will probably stymie their growth going forward.

    • git@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They said that they want to federate but it isn’t feasible with current mod tools and that they made request for more dev tools. So hopefully they can federate again soon

      • Ado@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, just seems they got overwhelmed by the amount of posts. I think that’s fair given all of us reddit refugees

      • Floufym@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am actually happy to see that Lemmy is a much safer space than Reddit. And I can understand any move to keep it safer.

      • eskimofry@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        This doesn’t sound in line with the moderator reasoning on the source post. They wanted better moderation tools to handle the influx of new users. Sure one can read between the lines as much as they want… doesn’t make it anything more than a wild accusation.

  • Turtle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems like they’re just using the wrong software? A private forum is more in line with what they want it seems.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People joined Beehaw because it’s the most similar instance to current reddit. The problem is that current reddit policy just doesn’t work.

    I think it’ll take time for all the reddit migration to develop a unique Lemmy culture away from reddit (there is always risk for a bad culture like what happened to Voat of course), and if they continue their current course, Beehaw will just get left behind as proof of failure of Reddit remnant on Lemmy.

    • Geth@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reddit actually allows downvotes. Beehaw is more of a forced safe space.

      • hskrnut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s incredibly silly. Are they seriously not interested in gaining the huge influx of reddugees (still workshopping that one), this is the moment for Lemmy to gather a critical mass that has the possibility of attracting a large scale migration to the open distributed platform over the next couple years.

        • Kissaki@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Their announcement is decent, and explains their reasoning.

          They care about the general environment. The influx of users including some bad actors means they can’t effectively moderate and block them. They value a controlled safe space over influx of random users [with some bad actors].

          There’s a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it’s not just that, there’s a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it’s really hard to trust and support who’s around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there’s more hostility around them. They’ll even shut themselves off when there’s fake nice behavior around. There’s a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it’s not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can’t even assess that for people who aren’t from our instance, so we’re walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn’t sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

          Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren’t open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

        • Bubbles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Reddifugees? Redditfugees? Reddfugees? Now letters and words mean nothing to me, lol.

            • Fabriek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              On Mastodon there was this whole thing about users calling themselves Twitter refugees, and people expressing their displeasure with the term. It does feel a bit inappropriate to equite youself with actual refugees. We’re just moving from website to another.

              • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s language. In language, context is important. We don’t have infinite words, so I don’t agree with the idea of one singular context claiming sole ownership over any given word. There’s reasonable respectfulness towards people going through hardships, but there is no point in allowing any particular context to “own” a word that serves a whole lot of purposes.

        • Cobe98@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep. It’s just stupidity especially now. I don’t understand why someone would stay there and not go back to reddit for a walled garden experience?

      • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        The barrier being what you’re supposed to write when you sign up to convince them to bring you aboard? That anyone can make up? yeesh

  • poorlytunedAstring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was just poking around a bit over at beehaw, earlier. and I got the STRONG impression that they really weren’t in a position to deal with the sudden influx of users: not enough mod team, not enough money, not enough spare time in the day for the few people running it. I’m not holding that against them, that’s to be expected in Fediverse spaces, which I gather intend to spread the load across thousands of instances, not just one.

    Is this just them trying to get things under control, or was there some other problem?

    • Cobe98@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes excellent work explaining how this all works. This fragmentation is what I feared as it will cause users to get frustrated, give up and leave these communities.

  • TheAmishMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think this is the best explanation of how federation works that I’ve seen so far. Really appreciate it. So would it benefit us to use an account for me different website to get the benefit of both communities? Is there a way to be essentially logged into two accounts at once so that you can see separate federated communities all at once?

    • Music@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I can’t see everything at once, using the Jerboa android app I can easily switch between instances that I have logged into. It’s pretty easy to use!

  • Grassgrowz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    i deleted my beehaw account and registered here as soon as i read about the defederation. They’re trying to police the beehaw community way too much, bunch of softies imo…

  • FantasticFox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can understand wanting to have a well-moderated community.

    What I don’t understand is how they expect to do that with a moderation team of just 4 people.

    I guess now people will just leave Beehaw, its communities that were popular here will be replaced by others in the Fediverse and life will go on. The Fediverse is built to be resilient to such changes.

    • nivenkos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The crazy part is that they want to be able to view and comment on other instances’ posts but not vice versa.

      Like why should other instances agree to that?

      Hopefully beehaw dies off quickly.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hopefully beehaw dies off quickly.

        I don’t get why you hope for this? Isn’t the point of fediverse to have lot of different instances for different people?

        Beehaw will continue existing as it chooses to exist, with or without lemmy.world. Isn’t that a good thing? That’s decentralization. That’s what we want more of.

        • million@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a really shitty thing to do a growing platform. For the 3rd largest server to defederate a week into the platform growing is going to go a long way to convincing folks this platform isn’t viable. Honestly this may be it for me.

          The Beehaw admins are really in love with their ideals but I can’t help but feel like they have effectively kneecapped a new platform.

          • TiffyBelle@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think your points about frustration are valid, particularly at this time when there’s a lot of reddit refugees. That said, it’s Beehaw’s choice what they’re willing to put up with. I think defederation with entire instances is a very extreme response to their issues, but ultimately it’s their choice.

            I think with the admins’ mentality over there, they will probably end up with a very large defederation block list. For that reason, it is probably for the best if Lemmy’s most active communities were NOT hosted there. People should put the energy into building up other communities so the platform more broadly isn’t reliant on extremely moderated instances like Beehaw.

            Major communities should be on instances that welcome a wide range of views that are also willing to have a robust and diverse admin team to handle issues, imo. That would be the healthiest solution overall. Beehaw choosing to defederate now is a blessing in disguise; it’s an early statement proving that instance is an unsuitable host for any community looking to be home to a broad-reaching and diverse member base.

          • PumpedSardines@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is a roadblock for sure, but this platform does work. I feel like the fediverse is perfect for Reddit. As soon as chat moves from beehaw we’ll be rolling again!

      • ericjmorey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The crazy part is that they want to be able to view and comment on other instances’ posts but not vice versa

        Where did you get this idea from? They won’t be able to interact with other instances from Beehaw. They clearly don’t want to based on this action.

      • average650@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I disagree. It’s like a poorly implemented private subreddit. People didn’t complain that that was possible before and I don’t see why they should now.

        • nivenkos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s quite literally free-loading off other instances though.

          Not just in the content sense, but also the actual monetary cost of the image hosting, etc.

          • average650@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            A little yeah, but even then their posts can still be seen by everyone. But I got the impression that wasn’t at all the point anyway. It was to keep control over comments and content, not to not shift monetary costs, though I suppose that will be an unintended side effect.

          • ericjmorey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            How much cost are you to lemmy.world? Are you planning to track it and pay for it?

            How much cost is it to lemmy.world to federate with another instance? Are they going to keep track of it and send out invoices?

            This free-loading complaint rings hollow.

    • ericjmorey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are fine with being a small community. They aren’t interested in growth for growth’s sake. They existed for 18 months with around 200 members and were content with that continuing indefinitely. They aren’t against growth, they simply don’t value it highly.

    • bacondragonoverlord@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The idea is that every instance is basically responsible for their own users. And beehaw didn’t have confidence in the moderation of shit just works and lemmy.world and couldn’t keep up with banning them on their side. Thats why they defederated.

      • Spzi@lemmy.click
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The idea is that every instance is basically responsible for their own users.

        It’s correct what you say, but the idea bugs me the more I understand it.

        It feels like guilt by association. The actual cause is the behaviour of specific, individual users but the repercussions are equally felt by other users from the same instance. These other users can have nothing in common with the causing users, or might have even opposed them in their wrongdoings.

        There is also a level between users and instances; communities. Maybe the problem was with one specific community, yet all other communities who happen to live on the same instance feel the same consequences.

        Defederating individual communities would feel better for me, but ultimately I think a problem caused by individuals should be solved with these individuals, not with groups which are more or less meaningfully associated with those individuals.

        • agrammatic@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          undefined> It feels like guilt by association. The actual cause is the behaviour of specific, individual users but the repercussions are equally felt by other users from the same instance.

          That’s why I always thought that the ideal scenario for federated web is to have instances that are either single-user or are down to friends-of-friends level of members (say, under 100 users per instance), so that there can be social accountability and if you have a bad actor on your instance, then it’s easy to kick them out and preserve your reputation. Bad actors will concentrate on their own instances and they can be defederated without collateral damage.

          So, if Beehaw’s registration model is invite-only (that’s what I gather from this thread), then I think they probably have the right approach to federation; they are vouching for their users and they are responsible for making sure that they won’t be damaging communities across the federation.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It feels like guilt by association. The actual cause is the behaviour of specific, individual users but the repercussions are equally felt by other users from the same instance.

          As I understand the problem from their side is that to get an account on Beehaw, you have to go through an approval process. If a user there starts violating their policies, they can be banned and it’s harder and slower to make a new account to get around the van because of the approval process. But getting an account on the other two instances is automatic and instantaneous. If a person from this instance starts violating Beehaw policies in a post there, and Beehaw mods ban them, they can make a new account here and be back there causing trouble in seconds, which is apparently what some people did.

          The moderation tools are apparently pretty coarse right now, so they could essentially ignore it or defederate from us, and they chose the latter.

          • Risk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            People out to specifically troll beehaw will just keep going to other instances until beehaw completely blocks itself off from the entire fediverse.

            I don’t think the solution here is to defederate, but just to get more moderators (and better mod tools).

    • areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah having 4 mods for something this large isn’t realistic, though I also understand they have problems with the moderation tools. Hopefully they can find more mods and lemmy can get better tools. I think once that happens they are considering refederation.

      As much as it seems like a bone headed decision I can understand why they made it and that they probably didn’t have much choice given the resources theu have. I suggested to them that they should consider a whitelist/invite only system of users from certain instances instead. I haven’t heard back from the mods on that but another user has already tried to shoot me down.

      Edit: I have been told a whitelist isn’t currently supported by Lemmy.

      • FantasticFox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess that’s an improvement. I mean their users seem to like the set-up. I just don’t like not being able to create communities and having such a small group of users in control.

        It just seems ripe for abuse like we saw in Reddit.

        But that’s the wonder of the Fediverse, each user can pick their instance.

    • the_inebriati@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think you’re technically wrong, but I think with the reddit migration it’s overall damaging to the concept of a fediverse to have a large instance defederate with two huge instances.

      There are people who are just getting settled only to find out they now have to use two accounts to access the content they needed one for yesterday.

      • FantasticFox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, the solution is just to leave beehaw though. It takes a few minutes to make a new account on another instance. If they really want to access the beehaw stuff they could join an instance that is still federated with them, that way they could see the beehaw posts and the lemmy.world posts.

        It’s probably best just to abandon beehaw entirely though and use alternative communities in the Fediverse.

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People really shouldn’t see that as a bug, it’s a feature. Reddit does something you don’t like? Too bad. One instance in the fediverse does something you don’t like? It’s incredibly easy to leave. Maybe some day you’ll be able to transfer accounts to other instances, that’d be neat.

      • ChaosOnion@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I made a new account yesterday. The beehaw node was a choice but I did not take it. I won’t be making two accounts to access “all of this content” and this little bit over here.

        I’m not sure what would change my mind but it would need to be very enticing.

    • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It won’t. There will be likely lots of cases of mod abuse that ends up pushing users away. Moderation requires a healthy balance, not an extreme of either side. Lots of Reddit subs had similar issues, but they at least benefited from the overall growth of the platform itself to fill the previous slots with new users.

    • Magister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Beehaw is a safe place without trolls/fascists/racists/etc so they’ve just protected themselves from toxic trolls from lemmygrad or LW, that’s it.

        • gravalicious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like everything in /c/conservative.

          I really like that I can easily see upvotes vs downvotes. I’m not a reddit expert, but Apollo just showed the total/average/etc.

        • realhumanbean@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          no they don’t. if it’s a stupid take it should be able to stand out to be mocked and flamed or at least discussed. it’s where learning happens and echo chambers dissolve. if it’s truly psychotic it can be deleted.

        • possiblylinux127@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          They should just be reported to the mods. Or better yet, just don’t upvote comments you don’t like. There is no karma on lemmy

          • AgentGoldfish@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was a mod on an advice sub on reddit, this is a terrible idea.

            It was enough work as a mod to sift through things that actually needed to be reported. For advice, downvotes are needed to express when something is genuinely bad advice. It can’t be up to mods to sift through every single comment, that’d be impossible.

            • possiblylinux127@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Just don’t upvote bad advise and leave a comment of why it is bad. Downvoting has negative effects on the behavior of a community. It allows the majority to turn on the minority (sometimes the minority is wrong but still)

          • user@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did you like youtube removing the dislikes? Having a negative opinion is just as important as a positive one. We could remove all voting like this.

            • possiblylinux127@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Your welcome to have a negative option. However if you disagree with someone either ignore them or tell them why you disagree.

              On the flipside you could just upvote comments you agree with.

              • user@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not every criticism has to be constructive. Do you tell the schef why the food sucks exactly if you dont like it? No. You just say “fuck this” and leave or ask the waiter to take it back because its bad. Not the best example but you get the point. You dont just ignore everything you dont like. I dont understand what people think the difference is, between up and downvoting. They are both the exact same. One point up, or minus one point. Each is just as valid as the other.